Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Min v. Bei Bei Express et al
as 1:2023cv06639
Plaintiff:
Chang Gen Min
Defendant:
Bei Bei Express, Rui Ying Wang, Chen En and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00633
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv07112
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Navarro et al v. ABC Metro Cleaners L.E.S. Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv07193
Plaintiff:
Juan Navarro
Defendant:
ABC Metro Cleaners L.E.S. Inc. doing business as ABC Cleaner NYC, Sau Ying Wang and Xue Yu Lin
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv05966
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Luis Pastor et al v. ABC Metro Cleaners, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv06089
Defendant:
Sau Ying Wang, Davy Mak, ABC Metro Cleaners, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Jose Luis Pastor
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Oriental Dolphins Investments, LLC et al v. Kelly et al
as 1:2017cv05672
Plaintiff:
Oriental Dolphins Investments, LLC , Lidong Cao , Sitao Chen and others
Defendant:
John Kelly, James McCament, Nicholas Colucci and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv06685
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv09445
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 706
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv04313
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 706
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
