Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Young, Huguette v. Kaul, Josh
as 3:2020cv00935
Defendant:
Josh Kaul
Plaintiff:
Huguette Nicole Young
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
J & J Sports Productions Inc v. Don Lewis Young Urban Jazz Foundation Inc et al
as 2:2017cv01603
Plaintiff:
J & J Sports Productions Inc
Defendant:
Don Lewis Young Urban Jazz Foundation Inc and Donald R Lewis
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 605
Young v. Online Collections
as 2:2017cv01234
Plaintiff:
Justin Young
Defendant:
Online Collections
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Young v. Vocke et al
as 2:2013cv00635
Plaintiff:
Fred M Young
Defendant:
Timothy Vocke, Gerald C Nichol, Michael Brennan and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION v. YOUNG et al
as 3:2009mc00020
Plaintiff:
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Defendant:
DONALD ANTHONY WALKER YOUNG, ACORN CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, LLC, ACORN II, L.P. and others
United States Securities and Exchange Commission v. Young et al
as 2:2009mc00059
Plaintiff:
United States Securities and Exchange Commission, United States Securities and Exchange Commission, United States Securities and Exchange Commission and others
Defendant:
Donald Anthony Walker Young, Donald Anthony Walker Young, Acorn Capital Management LLC and others
Arrington, et al v. Elections Board, et al
as 2:2001cv00121
Plaintiff:
Rev Olen Arrington, Jr, Alvin Baldus, Stephen H Braunginn and others
Defendant:
State of Wisconsin Elections Board, John P Savage, David Halbrooks and others
Intervenor Plaintiff:
James R Baumgart, Roger M Breske, Brian T Burke and others
Intervenor Defendant:
Scott R Jensen and Mary E Panzer
Amicus Curiae:
Leon Young, Annette Polly Williams, Hon Frederick Kessler and others
Interested Party:
Wisconsin Government Accountability Board
Petitioner:
Janine P Geske
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
