Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00385
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
YOUNT v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv15972
Plaintiff:
SAMUEL YOUNT
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
YOUNT v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv01261
Plaintiff:
RONALD YOUNT
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
YOUNTS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2022cv03055
Plaintiff:
BOBBY M YOUNTS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
YOUNT v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2022cv01483
Plaintiff:
BRIAN YOUNT
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
ALMENDINGER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2022cv00777
Plaintiff:
DAVID ALMENDINGER, BLAIR ASHBY, STEVE BALLARD and others
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
YOUNT v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv26383
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
KENNETH YOUNT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
YOUNT v. FREEDOM HOME OFFERS LLC
as 0:2021cv61010
Defendant:
FREEDOM HOME OFFERS LLC
Plaintiff:
MASON YOUNT
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
YOUNTS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv16674
Plaintiff:
DONALD YOUNTS
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
YOUNT v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2020cv11879
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES YOUNT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
