Cases 1 - 7 of 7
HORTON et al v. AC&S, INC., et al
as 2:2010cv63559
Plaintiff:
CHARLES HORTON , WANDO HORTON , ELLIS HAWKINS and others
Defendant:
AC&S, INC., ASBESTOSPRAY CORP., FOSTER WHEELER CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ALLEN et al v. CONGOLEUM CORPORATION
as 2:2010cv61505
Plaintiff:
WILLIE H. ALLEN and ZATCHES ALLEN
Defendant:
CONGOLEUM CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Zatches Allen, et al. v. A.c. And S. Inc. (armstrong Cont, et al.
as PAE/2:09-CV-83835
Defendant:
A.c. And S. Inc. (armstrong Cont
Plaintiff:
Zatches Allen
ALLEN et al v. AMCHEM PRODUCTS, INC. N/K/A RHONE POULENC, INC. et al
as 2:2009cv85351
Plaintiff:
WILLIE H. ALLEN, WILLIE H. ALLEN, ZATCHES ALLEN and others
Defendant:
AMCHEM PRODUCTS, INC. N/K/A RHONE POULENC, INC., CERTAINTEED CORPORATION, PATTERSON PUMP COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
ALLEN et al v. A.C. AND S. INC. (ARMSTRONG CONTRACTING & SUPPLY) et al
as 2:2009cv83835
Plaintiff:
WILLIE H. ALLEN, WILLIE H. ALLEN, ZATCHES ALLEN and others
Defendant:
A.C. AND S. INC. (ARMSTRONG CONTRACTING & SUPPLY), A.P. GREEN INDUSTRIES, INC., A.P. GREEN SERVICES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
ABRAHAM et al v. A.C. and S., Inc., et al
as 2:2007cv66201
Plaintiff:
DENOTA ABRAHAM, JEROME D. ACKLIN, RUTHIE ACKLIN and others
Receiver:
BRUCE CARMAN
Defendant:
A.C. AND S. INC. (ARMSTRONG CONTRACTING & SUPPLY), A.P. GREEIN INDUSTRIES, INC., A.P. GREEN SERVICES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
ALLEN et al v. AMCHEM PRODUCTS, INC. et al
as 2:2007cv66629
Plaintiff:
Zatches Allen, III and CHRISTINE ALLEN
Defendant:
AMCHEM PRODUCTS, INC., AMERICAN OPTICAL CORPORATION, CERTAIN TEED CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
