Cases filed in the Federal Circuit Courts
Citigroup, Inc. v. US
as 24-1465
Plaintiff: CITIGROUP, INC., and Subsidiaries, including Citibank, N.A. as successor in interest to Glendale Federal Bank, FSB
Defendant: UNITED STATES
Citigroup, Inc. v. US
as 24-1413
Plaintiff: CITIGROUP, INC., and Subsidiaries, including Citibank, N.A. as successor in interest to Glendale Federal Bank, FSB
Defendant: UNITED STATES
Suprajit Controls, Div of Suprajit USA Inc., Successor-in-Interest to Kongsberg Automotive Inc. v. United States
as 1:2023cv00181
Plaintiff: Suprajit Controls, Div of Suprajit USA Inc., Successor-in-Interest to Kongsberg Automotive Inc.
Defendant: United States
Cirba Inc. v. VMware, Inc.
as 23-1770
Plaintiff / Appellant: CIRBA INC., dba Densify, as the successor-in-interest to Cirba IP, Inc.
Defendant / Appellee: VMWARE, INC.
PD Liquidating Trust v. US
as 21-1847
Plaintiff / Appellant: PD LIQUIDATING TRUST, successor in interest to PAULA DOUGLASS
Defendant / Appellee: UNITED STATES
U.S. Bank National v. 2150 Joshua's Path, LLC
as 20-2248
Defendant / Appellant: TEDDY D. WEISS, ARMAND D'AMATO and 2150 JOSHUA'S PATH, LLC
Plaintiff / Appellee: U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, (as successor-in-interest to Bank of America, National Association, as successor by merger to LaSalle Bank National Association), as trustee for the Registered Holders of CD 2005-CD1 Commercial Mortgage Trust, Commerci
BOEING COMPANY V ENERGY
as 09-1315
Appellant: The Boeing Company (Successor-in-Interest of Rockwell Intl Corp)
THATCHER V KOHLS DEPT STORES We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 04-1397
Plaintiff-Appellant: DECKERS OUTDOOR CORPORATION (Successor in Interest) and MARK THATCHER
Defendant-Appellee: KOHL'S CORPORATION and KOHL'S DEPARTMENT STORES, INC.
HAYES V US
as 03-5050
Plaintiff-Appellant: PAT H. HAYES,as Successor in Interest to LEONA JAMES HAYES
Defendant-Appellee: UNITED STATES

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?