Cases 21 - 30 of 30
CARLTON v. PFIZER INC et al
as 2:2010cv00214
Plaintiff:
CYNTHIA CARLTON
Defendant:
PFIZER INC, PHARMACIA CORPORATION and G D SEARLE LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DUGUAY v. WILSON et al
as 2:2010cv00159
Plaintiff:
VERONICA D DUGUAY
Defendant:
FRANK E WILSON and SWIFT TRANSPORTATION CO INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WALKER-KETCH v. PFIZER INC et al
as 1:2010cv00036
Plaintiff:
DIANE WALKER-KETCH
Defendant:
PFIZER INC , PHARMACIA CORPORATION and G D SEARLE LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
BROWN v. F/V DUCHESS II INC
as 2:2009cv00626
Plaintiff:
WAYNE D BROWN
Defendant:
DUCHESS II INC F/V
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
YORK v. PFIZER INC et al
as 1:2009cv00589
Plaintiff:
LARRY YORK, SR
Defendant:
PFIZER INC , PHARMACIA CORPORATION and G D SEARLE LLC
Cause Of Action: Diversity
LACHANCE v. UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
as 1:2009cv00591
Plaintiff:
MARY D LACHANCE
Defendant:
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
MACVANE et al v. S D WARREN COMPANY LLC
as 2:2008cv00388
Plaintiff:
ANDREW MACVANE and DENA MACVANE
Defendant:
S D WARREN COMPANY LLC
Cause Of Action: Diversity
MARKHEIM et al v. SHUMWAY et al
as 2:2008cv00319
Plaintiff:
RYAN D MARKHEIM and HEATHER M MARKHEIM
Defendant:
G CHARLES SHUMWAY, II and CHILDS RUNDLETT FIFIELD SHUMWAY ALTSHULER LLC
Objector:
J SCOTT DAVIS
Movant:
MAINE BOARD OF OVERSEERS OF THE BAR
Cause Of Action: Diversity
MCADAM v. PFIZER INC et al
as 1:2008cv00166
Plaintiff:
MARLENE MCADAM
Defendant:
PFIZER INC, PHARMACIA CORPORATION and G D SEARLE LLC
Cause Of Action: Diversity
ST PIERRE v. WAL MART STORES INC et al
as 2:2007cv00045
Plaintiff:
JACQUELYNN D ST PIERRE and SHARON ST PIERRE
Defendant:
WAL MART STORES INC , WAL MART STORES EAST INC and WAL MART REALTY COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
