Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Beasley v. Kilolo Kijakazi
as 6:2022cv00621
Plaintiff:
Dentry D. Beasley
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security and Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Miller v. Kijakazi
as 5:2022cv00406
Plaintiff:
Michael D. Miller
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
FILING ERROR
as 5:2022cv00402
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL D. MILLER
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Diaz v. Saul
as 2:2020cv00059
Plaintiff:
Maria D. Diaz
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Lamons v. Saul
as 3:2020cv00094
Defendant:
Andrew Saul
Plaintiff:
Eric D. Lamons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Kim, Ph. D. v. Genesis Area Development et al
as 1:2018cv00511
Defendant:
Genesis Area Development and Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
Koo-Hyun Kim, Ph. D.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
Villegas v. Berryhill
as 5:2017cv01247
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Notice Only Party:
Social Security Liaison and U.S. Attorney Liaison
Plaintiff:
Alma D. Villegas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Hooks v. Social Security Administration
as 1:2017cv00851
Plaintiff:
Arthur D. Hooks
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Notice Only Party:
Social Security Liaison and U.S. Attorney Liaison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Hooks v. Berryhill
as 5:2017cv00302
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Plaintiff:
Arthur D. Hooks
Notice Only Party:
Social Security Liaison and U.S. Attorney Liaison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Darlene D. Partida v. Carolyn W. Colvin, Social Security Comm.
as 5:2015cv01148
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Plaintiff:
Darlene D. Partida
Notice Only Party:
Social Security Liaison and U.S. Attorney Liaison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
