Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Stephens et al v. Lin et al
as 3:2021cv01216
Plaintiff:
Randolph Stephens and Wendy Stephens
Defendant:
Hongyu Lin and Lin Trading Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Deckers Outdoor Corporation v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A"
as 1:2018cv08048
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A", ChenJian Juan, Somefashion and others
Plaintiff:
Deckers Outdoor Corporation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Deckers Outdoor Corporation v. Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A", The
as 1:2018cv07675
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A", cheapuggbootsonlinesale.com, didocobao and others
Plaintiff:
Deckers Outdoor Corporation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Canada Goose Inc. v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A"
as 1:2018cv01852
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A", Chen Jun, Wang Sheng An and others
Plaintiff:
Canada Goose Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Canada Goose Inc. v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A"
as 1:2018cv00362
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A", michelle eiffel, David Fruehauf and others
Plaintiff:
Canada Goose Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Swarovski Aktiengesellschaft et al v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A"
as 1:2017cv05664
Plaintiff:
Swarovski Aktiengesellschaft and Swarovski North America Limited
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A", Xiong Hui Liu, XiongHui Liu (2) and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
