Cases 11 - 20 of 35
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv05974
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv06035
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Zhang v. J R Sushi 2 Inc et al
as 1:2020cv02555
Defendant:
J R Sushi 2 Inc, Kai Tuan Wang and Yi Feng Yang
Plaintiff:
Guo Li Zhang
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
United States of America v. Yang, Kao et al
as 3:2020cv00223
Defendant:
Kao Yang and Li Zhang
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Liu et al v. OP Realty Partners, LLC et al
as 6:2019cv02041
Plaintiff:
Lin Liang, Jianjun Li, Wei Song and others
Defendant:
OP Realty Partners, LLC, OP Condominium Management, LLC and Max P Cawal
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2018cv80354
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0157
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2017cv06775
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Review of denial of an application for naturalization
Li et al v. Walsh, et al
as 9:2016cv81871
Plaintiff:
LAN LI , YING TAN , TAO XIONG and others
Defendant:
JOSEPH WALSH, JOSEPH WALSH, JR., J. MARCUS PAYNE and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 0022
Luxottica Group S.p.A. et al v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A"
as 1:2016cv07667
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A", Zhang Ziyi, Yiyi Zhang and others
Plaintiff:
Luxottica Group S.p.A, Luxottica Group S.p.A. and Oakley, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2016cv00564
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Application for Naturalization
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
