Cases 1 - 10 of 11
SMART Local 265 Welfare Fund et al v. Anderson Mechanical Systems, Inc.
as 1:2018cv04141
Plaintiff:
SMART Local 265 Welfare Fund , SMART Local 265 Pension Fund , SMART Local 265 Joint Apprentice Training Committee and others
Defendant:
Anderson Mechanical Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Sheet Metal Workers Local 265 Welfare Fund et al v. Anderson Mechanical Systems, Inc.
as 1:2015cv08960
Plaintiff:
Sheet Metal Workers Local 265 Welfare Fund , Sheet Metal Workers Local 265 Pension Fund , Sheet Metal Workers Local 265 Educational Fund and others
Defendant:
Anderson Mechanical Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132
Plumbers Pension Fund Local 130 U A et al v. Anderson Mechanical Systems, Inc.
as 1:2013cv02345
Plaintiff:
Plumbers Pension Fund Local 130 U A , Apprentice and Journeymen Education and Training, Local Union 130, UA , Chicago Journeymen Plumbers Local Union 130, U.A. Group Legal Services Plan Fund and others
Defendant:
Anderson Mechanical Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1145 E.R.I.S.A.
Wisconsin Sheet Metal Workers Health and Benefit Fund et al v. Bredan Mechanical Systems Inc
as 2:2012cv00619
Plaintiff:
Wisconsin Sheet Metal Workers Health and Benefit Fund , Milwaukee Area Sheet Metal Journeymen and Apprenticeship Training Fund , Wisconsin Sheet Metal Workers 401(K) Profit Sharing Plan and others
Defendant:
Bredan Mechanical Systems Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Sheet Metal Workers Local 265 Welfare Fund et al v. Anderson Mechanical Systems, Inc.
as 1:2012cv04196
Plaintiff:
Sheet Metal Workers Local 265 Welfare Fund , Sheet Metal Workers Local 265 Pension Fund , Sheet Metal Workers Local 265 Educational Fund and others
Defendant:
Anderson Mechanical Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Board of Trustees of the Local Union No. 422 U.A. of Joliet, Illinois Pension Fund et al v. Anderson Mechanical Systems, Inc. et al
as 1:2011cv04371
Plaintiff:
Board of Trustees of the Local Union No. 422 U.A. of Joliet, Illinois Pension Fund and Board of Trustees of the Local Union No. 422 U.A. of Joliet, Illinois Welfare Fund
Defendant:
Anderson Mechanical Systems, Inc. and Timothy Anderson
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
The Construction Industry Retirement Fund of Rockford, Illinois et al v. Xcell Mechanical Systems, Inc.
as 3:2011cv50131
Plaintiff:
The Construction Industry Retirement Fund of Rockford, Illinois and The Construction Industry Welfare Fund of Rockford, Illinois
Defendant:
Xcell Mechanical Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Board of Trustees of the Local Union No. 422 U.A. of Joliet, Illinois Pension Fund et al v. Anderson Mechanical Systems, Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv06812
Plaintiff:
Board of Trustees of the Local Union No. 422 U.A. of Joliet, Illinois Pension Fund and Board of Trustees of the Local Union No. 422 U.A. of Joliet, Illinois Welfare Fund
Defendant:
Anderson Mechanical Systems, Inc. and Timothy Anderson
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Board of Trustees of the Local Union No. 422 U.A. of Joliet et al v. Anderson Mechanical Systems, Inc. et al
as 1:2009cv03517
Plaintiff:
Board of Trustees of the Local Union No. 422 U.A. of Joliet, Board of Trustees of the Local Union No. 422 U.A. of Joliet, Illinois Pension Fund and Board of Trustees of the Local Union No. 422 of Joliet, Illinois Welfare Fund and others
Defendant:
Anderson Mechanical Systems, Inc. and Timothy Anderson
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Board of Trustees of the Local Union No. 422 U.A. of Joliet et al v. Anderson Mechanical Systems, Inc.
as 1:2007cv05128
Plaintiff:
Board of Trustees of the Local Union No. 422 U.A. of Joliet, Illinois Pension Fund and Board of Trustees of the Local Union No. 422 U.A. of Joliet and Illinois Welfare Fund
Defendant:
Anderson Mechanical Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
