Cases filed in the D.C. Circuit Courts
Cases 11 - 20 of 82
Nancy Huisha-Huisha, et al v. Alejandro Mayorkas, et al
as 22-5325
Plaintiff / Appellee: Nancy Gimena Huisha-Huisha, and her minor child, I.M.C.H., Valeria Macancela Bermejo, and her minor daughter and others
Defendant / Appellant: Alejandro N. Mayorkas, Secretary of Homeland Security, in his official capacity, Tae Johnson, Senior Official Performing the Duties of the Director of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, in his official capacity, Rochelle P. Walensky, Dr., Director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, in her official capacity and others
Intervenor: State of Arizona, State of Louisiana, State of Alabama and others
Amicus Curiae: State of Mississippi
Petitioner: Immigration Reform Law Institute
State of Texas, et al v. NHTSA, et al
as 22-1144
Petitioner: State of Texas, State of Arkansas, State of Indiana and others
Respondent: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Steven Cliff, in his offical capacity as Administrator of the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, United States Department of Transportation and others
State of Ohio, et al v. EPA, et al
as 22-1081
Petitioner: State of Ohio, State of Alabama, State of Arkansas and others
Respondent: Environmental Protection Agency and Michael S. Regan, in his official capacity as Administrator of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Intervenor: State of California, State of Colorado, State of Connecticut and others
Amicus Curiae: The Two Hundred for Housing Equity, Americans for Tax Reform, American Commitment and others
Not Yet Classified: ConservAmerica
State of Texas, et al v. EPA, et al
as 22-1031
Petitioner: State of Texas, State of Alabama, State of Alaska and others
Respondent: Environmental Protection Agency and Michael S. Regan, Administrator, United States Environmental Protection Agency,
State of New York, et al v. Meta Platforms, Inc. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 21-7078
Plaintiff / Appellant: State of New York, District of Columbia, State of California and others
Defendant / Appellee: Facebook, Inc. and Meta Platforms, Inc.
Amicus Curiae: United States of America, American Antitrust Institute, Committee to Support the Antitrust Laws and others
Commonwealth of Virginia, et al v. David Ferriero
as 21-5096
Plaintiff / Appellant: Commonwealth of Virginia, State of Nevada and State of Illinois
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee: State of Tennessee, State of Louisiana, State of South Dakota and others
Defendant / Appellee: David Ferriero, in his official capacity as Archivist of the United States
STATE OF COLORADO et al v. GOOGLE LLC
as 1:2020cv03715
Plaintiff: STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA, STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, STATE OF NEBRASKA and others
Defendant: GOOGLE LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
STATE OF NEW YORK et al v. FACEBOOK, INC.
as 1:2020cv03589
Plaintiff: STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA, STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, STATE OF NEBRASKA and others
Defendant: FACEBOOK, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 Antitrust Litigation
STATE OF ALABAMA et al v. NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE LLC
as 1:2020cv03551
Plaintiff: STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA, STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, STATE OF MINNESOTA and others
Defendant: NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE LLC agent of d/b/a MR. COOPER and NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE LLC doing business as MR. COOPER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al v. GOOGLE LLC We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2020cv03010
Plaintiff: STATE OF ARKANSAS, STATE OF LOUISIANA, STATE OF FLORIDA and others
Defendant: GOOGLE LLC
Not Classified By Court: STATE OF MICHIGAN and STATE OF CALIFORNIA
3Rd Party Defendant: NBCUNIVERSAL MEDIA, LLC, COMCAST CORPORATION and SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC.
Petitioner: AMAZON.COM, INC., APPLE INC., DUCK DUCK GO, INC. and others
Respondent: BOOKING HOLDINGS INC. and YELP INC.
Interested Party: STATE OF WASHINGTON
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?