Cases 1 - 10 of 23,912
Portx, Inc. v. Port X Logistics, LLC
as 1:2024cv00475
Plaintiff:
Portx, Inc.
Defendant:
Port X Logistics, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Mechanical Licensing Collective v. Spotify USA Inc.
as 1:2024cv03809
Plaintiff:
Mechanical Licensing Collective
Defendant:
Spotify USA Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Bass v. Vox Media, LLC
as 1:2024cv03771
Plaintiff:
Gabriella Bass
Defendant:
Vox Media, LLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Mecea v. Earl G. Graves Ltd
as 1:2024cv03765
Plaintiff:
Robert Mecea
Defendant:
Earl G. Graves Ltd doing business as Black Enterprises
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
McDermott v. Deborah Bradley Construction & Management Services Inc.
as 1:2024cv03785
Plaintiff:
Matthew McDermott
Defendant:
Deborah Bradley Construction & Management Services Inc.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Steven Hirsch Inc. v. Earl G. Graves Ltd
as 1:2024cv03768
Plaintiff:
Steven Hirsch Inc.
Defendant:
Earl G. Graves Ltd doing business as Black Enterprises
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Farrington v. Slice Wireless Solutions LLC
as 1:2024cv03783
Plaintiff:
William Farrington
Defendant:
Slice Wireless Solutions LLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Lehrman et al v. Lovo, Inc.
as 1:2024cv03770
Plaintiff:
Paul Lehrman and Linnea Sage
Defendant:
Lovo, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Viacom International Inc. v. Bulman et al
as 5:2024cv00665
Plaintiff:
Viacom International Inc.
Defendant:
Thomas Bulman, Thom Bulman LLC and Bull Airs NY LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051 Trademark Infringement
Harbus v. Vosa TV Inc
as 1:2024cv03572
Plaintiff:
Richard Harbus
Defendant:
Vosa TV Inc
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
