Cases 1 - 10 of 60,267
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2025cv00989
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
WIDAKUSWARA et al v. LAKE et al
as 1:2025cv01015
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
DARBANI et al v. RUBIO et al
as 1:2025cv00998
Plaintiff:
ERFAN DARBANI and JAMALEDDIN DARBANI
Defendant:
MARCO RUBIO, JULIE STUFFT, MARTINA STRONG and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
INDIAN RIVER MEMORIAL HOSPITAL, INC. et al v. KENNEDY
as 1:2025cv01022
Plaintiff:
INDIAN RIVER MEMORIAL HOSPITAL, INC., FAYETTE MEDICAL CENTER, DCH REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER and others
Defendant:
ROBERT F. KENNEDY, JR.
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2025cv01011
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2025cv01000
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2025cv01005
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
ANDERSON v. BDO USA, P.C.
as 1:2025cv01002
Plaintiff:
KEVIN ANDERSON
Defendant:
BDO USA, P.C.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
REED v. ASHWORTH
as 1:2025cv01004
Plaintiff:
NOREEN REED
Defendant:
GARY A. ASHWORTH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
DC GAMBLING RECOVERY LLC v. AMERICAN WAGERING, INC. DBA CAESARS SPORTSBOOK et al
as 1:2025cv01023
Plaintiff:
DC GAMBLING RECOVERY LLC
Defendant:
AMERICAN WAGERING, INC. DBA CAESARS SPORTSBOOK, BETFAIR INTERACTIVE US LLC DBA FANDUEL, BETMGM, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
