Cases 1 - 10 of 456
Cochran v. Hewlett-Packard Company, et al
as 24-1151
Plaintiff:
DANIEL COCHRAN
Defendant:
HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY, HP ENTERPRISE SERVICES, LLC, HEWLETT-PACKARD ENTERPRISE CO. and others
Su v. Ascent Construction, et al
as 24-4025
Plaintiff:
JULIE A. SU, Acting Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor
Defendant:
ASCENT CONSTRUCTION, INC., a Utah corporation, BRADLEY L. KNOWLTON, an individual, ASCENT CONSTRUCTION, INC. EMPLOYEE STOCK OWNERSHIP PLAN, an employee benefit plan and others
Sparrow v. UMR, et al
as 24-1118
Plaintiff:
RACHEL SPARROW, Individually and on behalf of her minor child, H.S.
Defendant:
UMR, INC., THE AMERICAN AIRLINES, INC. HEALTH AND WELFARE PLAN FOR ACTIVE EMPLOYEES and AMERICAN AIRLINES, INC.
Lomax v. Longmont United Hospital, et al
as 24-1032
Petitioner:
MATTHEW S. LOMAX, Regional Director of Region 27 of the National Labor Relations Board, for and on behalf of the National Labor Relations Board
Respondent:
LONGMONT UNITED HOSPITAL and CENTURA HEALTH, as a single employer
Jensen v. Life Insurance Company of North America, et al
as 24-4014
Plaintiff:
JILL L. JENSEN
Defendant:
LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA and CIGNA HEALTH AND LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
Dahl v. Petroplex Acidizing
as 24-2038
Plaintiff:
DARVIN DAHL, individually and on behalf of all those similarly situated
Defendant:
PETROPLEX ACIDIZING, INC.
Sawyer v. Big Green
as 24-1044
Plaintiff:
PAULA S. SAWYER, Regional Director of Region 27 of the National Labor Relations Board,
Defendant:
BIG GREEN
Lomax v. Longmont United Hospital, et al
as 24-1014
Petitioner:
MATTHEW S. LOMAX, Regional Director of Region 27 of the National Labor Relations Board, for and on behalf of the National Labor Relations Board
Respondent:
LONGMONT UNITED HOSPITAL and CENTURA HEALTH, as a single employer
Ingram v. United Biosource Corporation
as 23-3270
Plaintiff:
K. K. INGRAM
Defendant:
UNITED BIOSOURCE CORPORATION
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
