Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in the D.C. Circuit Courts
Cases 41 - 50 of 8,344
Timothy Young v. Merrick Garland, et al
as 23-5303
Plaintiff: Timothy Doyle Young
Defendant: Merrick B. Garland, Michael J. Horowitz, United States Department of Health & Human Services and others
HAIMANIO v. DEKALB COUNTY POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 1:2023cv03827
Plaintiff: APOJON PAPA HAIMANIO
Defendant: DEKALB COUNTY POLICE DEPARTMENT, MONICA PANOSIAN, GREGORY MOORE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HILL v. JAMISON
as 1:2024cv00171
Petitioner: ERIC RODNEY HILL
Respondent: J. JAMISON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BARRY v. INCH et al
as 1:2023cv03614
Plaintiff: BRANDIE LEE BARRY and RANDY CLAYTON BARRY
Consolidated Plaintiff: WILLIAM RILEY, SANDRA BLEVINS, JAMIE A. MADDOX and others
Defendant: MARK S INCH, MICHAEL CARVAJAL, JOHN DOE #1 and others
Interested Party: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-5302
Not Yet Classified: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Edson Gelin v. USA
as 23-5305
Plaintiff: Edson Gelin
Defendant: United States of America
Rozina Muthoka v. League of Nations, et al
as 23-5300
Plaintiff: Rozina Kimani Muthoka
Defendant: League of Nations, United Nations, United States of America and others
HILL v. JAMISON We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2024cv00027
Petitioner: ERIC RODNEY HILL
Respondent: J. JAMISON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
DALCOLLO v. FLORES et al
as 1:2023cv03713
Plaintiff: JUSTIN L. DALCOLLO
Defendant: RAMERO FLORES, MARY FLORES and ANTHONY WILLS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Marquis Heard v. Scott Harris
as 23-5272
Plaintiff / Appellant: Marquis Deron Heard
Defendant / Appellee: Scott Harris, Official Capacity

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?