Cases 1 - 10 of 3,849
Chrustowski v. Bishop et al
as 1:2024cv00555
Petitioner:
Renee A. Chrustowski
Respondent:
Robert Bishop and Phillip Bishop
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Carter v. Troxler
as 1:2024mc00229
Plaintiff:
Jermaine Layton Carter
Defendant:
Bureau Chief Shane Troxler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Muhammad v. Mason
as 1:2024cv00529
Petitioner:
Walid Abdullah Muhammad, King Walid Abdullah Muhammad and Waliyd Muhammad
Respondent:
Bernadette Mason
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Broomer, Sr. v. Emig et al
as 1:2024cv00311
Petitioner:
Donald Broomer, Sr.
Respondent:
Brian Emig and Kathleen Jennings
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rivera v. May et al
as 1:2024cv00522
Plaintiff:
Michael A. Rivera
Defendant:
Robert May, Tasha Hollingsworth, Lt. Daum and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carter v. Connolly et al
as 1:2024mc00221
Plaintiff:
Jermaine Layton Carter
Defendant:
Colm F. Connolly, Collins Seitz and Shane Troxler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hopper v. Superior Court of the State of Delaware et al
as 1:2024cv00528
Plaintiff:
Chad Eric Hopper
Defendant:
Superior Court of the State of Delaware and Andrea Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. Emig et al
as 1:2024cv00514
Petitioner:
Tyree Jackson
Respondent:
Brian Emig and Kathleen Jennings
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Fry v. Rash et al
as 1:2024cv00510
Plaintiff:
Eric R. Fry
Defendant:
State Trooper Cpl. Gregory Rash, D.A.G Isaac Rank, D.A.G. James Betts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hollingsworth v. Yellen
as 1:2024cv00503
Plaintiff:
Thomas A. Hollingsworth, Jr.
Defendant:
Janet Yellen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
