Cases 61 - 70 of 165,711
Elder v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01999
Plaintiff:
Phillip Elder
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Robison et al v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02001
Plaintiff:
Johnny P. Robison and Malinda Robison
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Sizemore et al v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02002
Plaintiff:
Steven Perry Sizemore and Alyssa Sizemore
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Pitts et al v. Bob Evans Farms, LLC
as 2:2024cv01992
Plaintiff:
Crystal Pitts, Sandra Arnett and Demetrius Harvey
Defendant:
Bob Evans Farms, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
as 1:2024cv00228
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
as 2:2024cv02008
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Hooks v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02017
Plaintiff:
Rosina Hooks
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Willis v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02018
Plaintiff:
James Warren Willis
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Romero v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02015
Plaintiff:
Ernest J. Romero, Jr.
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Jones v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02016
Plaintiff:
Marion Jones
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
