Cases 1 - 10 of 3,641
Bonning v. Clifford
as 1:2024cv00249
Plaintiff:
Amy Rose Bonning
Defendant:
Matthew Clifford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Branigh v. Richardson
as 1:2024cv00247
Plaintiff:
Leotis B Branigh, III
Defendant:
Warden Tim Richardson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Baumgardner v. Idaho Department of Correction
as 1:2024cv00246
Plaintiff:
Stephen Mark Baumgardner
Defendant:
Idaho Department of Correction
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Caballero v. Jerome County Sheriff's Department
as 1:2024cv00232
Plaintiff:
Jerald W. Caballero
Defendant:
Jerome County Sheriff's Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Martin v. Tewalt
as 1:2024cv00241
Plaintiff:
Walter B. Martin
Defendant:
Josh Tewalt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Capone v. Tewalt
as 1:2024cv00236
Petitioner:
Charles Anthony Capone
Respondent:
Josh Tewalt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wintrode v. Twin Falls County Jail et al
as 1:2024cv00153
Plaintiff:
Joshwa Aaron Wintrode
Defendant:
Twin Falls County Jail, Twin Falls County Sheriff, Tom Carter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Carlin
as 1:2024cv00216
Petitioner:
Kilby Dee Williams
Respondent:
Terema Carlin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wintrode v. Carter et al
as 1:2024cv00227
Petitioner:
Joshwa Aaron Wintrode
Respondent:
Tom Carter and Twin Falls County Adult Detention Facility
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rogers v. Shoshone County, et al.
as 1:2024cv00146
Plaintiff:
Richard Elbert Rogers, Jr.
Defendant:
Shoshone County, Shoshone County Sheriff's Office, Schwartz Law and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
