Cases 1 - 10 of 278
FAGAN v. BARNHISER et al
as 2:2024cv06012
Plaintiff:
THOMAS J. FAGAN
Defendant:
BRET T. BARNHISER, NANOLOGIX, INC., DR. JONATHAN FARO and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity - Stockholders Suits
DAVIS v. ANGULO et al
as 2:2024cv05774
Plaintiff:
RUSKIN DAVIS
Defendant:
DAVID ANGULO, ARMANDO ANIDO, STEVEN C GILMAN and others
GU v. WANG et al
as 3:2024cv04348
Plaintiff:
DING GU
Defendant:
PETER ZUGUANG WANG, RAYMOND WANG, MING ZHAO and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity - Stockholders Suits
WILSON et al v. MONGON et al
as 3:2024cv00307
Plaintiff:
Susan K. Wilson and Jessica Bruckner
Defendant:
THIBAUT MONGON, PAUL RUH, HEATHER HOWLETT and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity - Stockholders Suits
MOORE v. VESTBERG et al
as 3:2023cv23071
Plaintiff:
COURTNEY MOORE
Defendant:
HANS VESTBERG, MATTHEW ELLIS, CLARENCE OTIS, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Securities Violation
SIPOS v. DIGESTIVE CARE, INC. et al
as 3:2023cv23137
Plaintiff:
PAUL SIPOS
Defendant:
DIGESTIVE CARE, INC., TIBOR SIPOS, SR., JOHN DOES (1-10) and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity - Stockholders Suits
HEICKLEN v. HOLLERAN et al
as 2:2023cv22649
Plaintiff:
STEVEN HEICKLEN
Defendant:
Kevin Holleran, STEPHEN J. FELICE, CHRISTOPHER F. BERTRAND and others
ROYZENSHTEYN et al v. ONYX ENTERPRISES CANADA INC. et al
as 3:2022cv07514
Plaintiff:
STANISLAV ROYZENSHTEYN and ROMAN GERASHENKO
Defendant:
ONYX ENTERPRISES CANADA INC., PRASHANT PATHAK, CAREY KURTIN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
WEISS v. MOYNIHAN et al
as 3:2023cv03851
Plaintiff:
ROBERT WEISS
Defendant:
BRIAN T. MOYNIHAN, SHARON L. ALLEN, FRANK P. BRAMBLE, SR. and others
MILIOTE v. BANK OF AMERICA
as 3:2023cv04869
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL MILIOTE
Defendant:
BANK OF AMERICA, BRYAN T. MOYNIHAN, SHARON L. ALLEN and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
