Cases 1 - 10 of 2,225
Tycon Systems Inc v. Tycon Security Advantage System LLC et al
as 2:2024cv00350
Plaintiff:
Tycon Systems Inc
Defendant:
Tycon Security Advantage System LLC and Frank Vuong
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Russell v. Omniq Corp
as 2:2024cv00347
Plaintiff:
Michael Sean Russell
Defendant:
Omniq Corp
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 0501 Copyright Infringement
Bucks & Bulls v. AZ Buck and Bulls
as 1:2024cv00049
Plaintiff:
Bucks & Bulls
Defendant:
AZ Buck and Bulls
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Portus Singapore Pte Ltd. et al v. Owlet Inc.
as 2:2024cv00343
Plaintiff:
Portus Singapore Pte Ltd. and Portus Pty Ltd.
Defendant:
Owlet Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 0271 Patent Infringement
Sunstone Engineering v. Pepe Tools
as 2:2024cv00334
Plaintiff:
Sunstone Engineering
Defendant:
Pepe Tools Inc.; an Oklahoma corporation doing business as Pepetools, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Kings Pond Enterprises v. Vermeyen
as 2:2024cv00327
Plaintiff:
Kings Pond Enterprises
Defendant:
Vermeyen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Patent Infringement
Boxabl Inc v. Box House Inc
as 4:2024cv00032
Plaintiff:
Boxabl Inc
Defendant:
Box House Inc, BoxHouse, Boxhouse Logistics Yard and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Trademark
CAO Group Inc v. Walmart Inc.
as 2:2024cv00175
Plaintiff:
CAO Group Inc
Defendant:
Walmart Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 0271 Patent Infringement
Hi-Tech Pharmaceuticals et al v. Vintage Muscle
as 2:2024cv00208
Plaintiff:
Hi-Tech Pharmaceuticals and Intellectual Wellness
Defendant:
Vintage Muscle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Patent Infringement
Vanngo v. Elixir Cosmetics OpCo, LLC
as 2:2024cv00300
Plaintiff:
Hung Vanngo
Defendant:
Elixir Cosmetics OpCo LLC doing business as Babe Original
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 0101 Copyright Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
