Cases 1 - 10 of 8,025
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00442
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. Pale Horse Drinkery, LLC et al
as 5:2024cv00441
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc.
Defendant:
Pale Horse Drinkery, LLC d/b/a Pale Horse Drinkery, d/b/a Pale Horse Drinkery and Sky Bar, and d/b/a Pale Horse Eatery & Skybar, John O. Seidel and Corey L. Conradt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00459
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
FILING ERROR
as 3:2024cv00146
Plaintiff:
Rose Salaiz
Defendant:
Safe Streets USA LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Salaiz v. Safe Streets USA LLC
as 3:2024cv00147
Plaintiff:
Rose Salaiz
Defendant:
Safe Streets USA LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00205
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00142
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Callier v. Open Mortgage, LLC
as 3:2024cv00137
Plaintiff:
Brandon L Callier
Defendant:
Open Mortgage, LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00433
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00439
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
