Cases 1 - 10 of 3,994
Pittman v. United States Government
as 1:2024cv02109
Plaintiff:
Nadera Pittman
Defendant:
United States Government
Dean v. Walmart Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv00090
Plaintiff:
Joeann Dean
Defendant:
Walmart Inc., ABC Corps #1-3 and John Does # 1-3
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Newbern v. Reyes et al
as 1:2024cv02111
Plaintiff:
Tamika Newbern
Defendant:
Ramon A. Reyes, Thomas Gerard Reed, Omni Hotels Management Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Devenpeck v. Pilot Travel Centers, LLC et al
as 4:2024cv00127
Plaintiff:
Lyle James Devenpeck
Defendant:
Pilot Travel Centers, LLC, PFJ Southeast LLC, John Doe(s) 1-3 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Whitley v. Zoes Kitchen Holding Company, LLC et al
as 1:2024cv02069
Plaintiff:
Patricia Whitley
Defendant:
Zoes Kitchen Holding Company, LLC and CAVA Group, Inc. doing business as Zoes Kitchen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Wallace v. Publix Super Markets, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv02068
Plaintiff:
Sharon Wallace
Defendant:
Publix Super Markets, Inc., ABC Corps #1-3 and John Does #1-3
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Bryant v. Greyhound et al
as 1:2024cv02054
Plaintiff:
Brenda Butler Bryant
Defendant:
Greyhound, Wil-lie Cope-Land, Fixobus and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
J.K. v. Safi Investment, Inc.
as 1:2024cv02030
Plaintiff:
J.K.
Defendant:
Safi Investment, Inc. doing business as Super 8
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1589 Forced Labor, Sex Trafficking
J.K. v. Main Street Lodging, Inc.
as 1:2024cv02031
Plaintiff:
J.K.
Defendant:
Main Street Lodging, Inc. doing business as Sundown Suites
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1589 Forced Labor, Sex Trafficking
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
