Cases 1 - 10 of 105
Luginbyhl v. O'Malley, et al
as 24-6082
Plaintiff:
LEVI MCRAE LUGINBYHL HAWKINS
Defendant:
MARTIN O'MALLEY, Social Security Commissioner and DANIEL I. WERFEL, Internal Revenue Service Commissioner
Massey v. Computershare Limited, et al
as 24-1095
Plaintiff:
JAMES HARRISON MASSEY
Defendant:
COMPUTERSHARE LIMITED, AKA Computershare, Inc., AKA Computershare US, Inc., BANK OF AMERICA, NA and SPECIALIZED LOAN SERVICING, LLC, AKA Computershare Loan Services
Dunn, et al v. Santa Fe Natural Tobacco Company, et al
as 23-2181
Plaintiff / Appellee:
MICHAEL ANDERSON, BROOKE BALOCCA, SARA BENSON and others
Defendant / Appellant:
R.J. REYNOLDS TOBACCO COMPANY, REYNOLDS AMERICAN, INC. and SANTA FE NATURAL TOBACCO COMPANY, INC.
May v. United States, et al
as 23-1323
Plaintiff / Appellant:
UNITED STATES EX REL. SAMUEL J. MAY, an individual
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, THE DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, an agency of the United Staes, THE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, an agency of the United States and others
KCI Auto Auction v. Anderson
as 23-3191
Plaintiff / Appellee:
KCI AUTO AUCTION, INC.
Defendant / Appellant:
ALONZO D. ANDERSON
Suburban Air Express v. Tohme Family Trust, et al
as 23-6148
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SUBURBAN AIR EXPRESS, INC., a Nebraska corporation
Defendant / Appellee:
TOHME FAMILY TRUST, a Texas Family Trust, ATI JET, INC., a Texas corporation and DEEANNA UNDERHILL
Hafen v. Howell, et al
as 23-4116
Plaintiff / Appellee:
JONATHAN O. HAFEN, in his capacity as Court-Appointed Receiver
Defendant / Appellant:
GRETCHEN A. HOWELL, an individual and LESLIE M. HOWELL, an individual
KCI Auto Auction v. Anderson
as 23-3094
Plaintiff / Appellee:
KCI AUTO AUCTION, INC.
Defendant / Appellant:
ALONZO D. ANDERSON
Sebastian, et al v. GreenLink International, et al
as 23-1145
Counter Defendant:
FRED SEBASTIAN and DUKE CAPITAL, S.A.
Counter Claimant:
GREENLINK INTERNATIONAL, INC., DOUGLAS N. MACDONALD and JAKE GEORGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
