Cases 11 - 20 of 338
Robert Fletcher, et al v. Peter Doig
as 23-2364
Plaintiff:
ROBERT FLETCHER and BARTLOW GALLERY, LTD
Appellant:
WILLIAM FREDERICK ZIESKE
Defendant / Appellee:
PETER DOIG
Jasen Bruzek, et al v. Husky Oil Operations, Ltd., et al
as 23-1941
Plaintiff / Appellee:
JASEN BRUZEK, Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, CHRISTOPHER PETERSON and HOPE KOPLIN
Defendant / Appellant:
HUSKY OIL OPERATIONS, LTD. and SUPERIOR REFINING COMPANY, LLC
Travis Huss v. Expert Automotive Services, LLC
as 23-1724
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TRAVIS DUANE HUSS
Defendant / Appellee:
EXPERT AUTOMOTIVE SERVICES, LLC
Yoram Kahn v. Walmart Inc.
as 23-1751
Plaintiff / Appellant:
YORAM KAHN, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Defendant / Appellee:
WALMART INC.
USA, et al v. Ajibola Ayeni, et al
as 23-1794
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and ROXANNE KLINE
Defendant / Appellant:
AJIBOLA A. AYENI and DOCS AT THE DOOR, P.C.
Pit Row, Inc., et al v. Costco Wholesale Corporation
as 23-1800
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PIT ROW, INC., NICOLET GAS, INC., S&K FOOD MART, INC. and others
Defendant / Appellee:
COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATION
Rajeev Varma v. David West, et al
as 23-1529
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RAJEEV VARMA
Defendant / Appellee:
DAVID S. WEST, DANIEL DOOLITTLE, OTHNIEL DOOLITTLE and others
Delma Warmack-Stillwell v. Christian Dior, Incorporated
as 23-1468
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DELMA WARMACK-STILLWELL, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Defendant / Appellee:
CHRISTIAN DIOR, INCORPORATED
Amit Trivedi v. Wells Fargo & Company, et al
as 23-1553
Plaintiff / Appellant:
AMIT TRIVEDI
Defendant / Appellee:
WELLS FARGO & COMPANY, BANK OF AMERICA CORPORATION and BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.
Howard Barnes v. Uber Technologies, Inc.
as 23-1493
Plaintiff / Appellant:
HOWARD BARNES
Defendant / Appellee:
UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
