Cases 11 - 20 of 365
NDOROMO v. GARLAND
as 1:2023cv03000
Plaintiff:
AKUBE WUROMONI NDOROMO
Defendant:
MERRICK B. GARLAND
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
REITER CONSULTING SERVICES, INC. v. HILDENBRAND et al
as 1:2023cv02805
Plaintiff:
REITER CONSULTING SERVICES, INC.
Defendant:
SANDRA HILDENBRAND and POTOMAC SOLUTIONS, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
TRAVELERS UNITED, INC. v. HYATT HOTELS CORPORATION et al
as 1:2023cv02776
Plaintiff:
TRAVELERS UNITED, INC.
Defendant:
HYATT HOTELS CORPORATION, HYATT CORPORATION and HYATT FRANCHISING, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
TRAVELERS UNITED, INC. v. SONESTA INTERNATIONAL HOTELS CORPORATION
as 1:2023cv02841
Plaintiff:
TRAVELERS UNITED, INC.
Defendant:
SONESTA INTERNATIONAL HOTELS CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
SOLOMON SHABAR PATE v. BP
as 1:2023cv02885
Plaintiff:
SOLOMON SHABAR PATE
Defendant:
BP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
THOMPSON v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2023cv02404
Plaintiff:
CEDRIC THOMPSON
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and AARON GUY DURDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
FORT MYER CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION v. SHRENSKY
as 1:2023cv02275
Plaintiff:
FORT MYER CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION
Defendant:
Lewis F Shrensky and LEWIS F. SHRENSKY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
HARCO, INC. v. VENTO et al
as 1:2023cv02482
Plaintiff:
HARCO, INC.
Defendant:
ROELL VENTO, LANI ESPARZA, REVOLVER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
ARAGONE v. PIERRE FABRE USA INC.
as 1:2023cv02308
Plaintiff:
MARIA ARAGONE
Defendant:
PIERRE FABRE USA INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 pl Petition for Removal - Product Liability
HALL v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
as 1:2023cv02285
Plaintiff:
GWENDOLYN HALL
Defendant:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
