Civil Rights Cases filed in Illinois
Cases 11 - 20 of 12,582
Jones v. Hooker et al
as 3:2024cv03121
Plaintiff: Gregory D Jones
Defendant: . Hooker, 4th Dist Appt Ct Clerk (J Doe) or rep and Cynthia A Grant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McClurge v. City of Chicago
as 1:2024cv03914
Plaintiff: Christopher McClurge
Defendant: City of Chicago
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Jones v. Hooker et al
as 1:2024cv03862
Plaintiff: Gregoy D Jones
Defendant: Judge Hooker, 4th Distr Cppt-Cpt- Clerk (J Doe) or rep. and Cynthia A Grant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vinet v. State of Illinois et al
as 1:2024cv03807
Petitioner: Richard J. Vinet
Respondent: State of Illinois
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mosley v. County Of Will et al
as 1:2024cv03792
Plaintiff: Johnathan N Mosley
Defendant: County Of Will, Nicolas Keedy, Anthony Gomez Delacasa and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brinson v. Dart et al
as 1:2024cv03741
Plaintiff: Sylvester Brinson
Defendant: Thomas Dart and Cook County, Illinois
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Davis v. Will County Public Defender et al
as 1:2024cv03681
Plaintiff: Steven Lamarr Davis
Defendant: Will County Public Defender
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lipscomb v. Wills et al
as 3:2024cv01232
Plaintiff: Keon V. Lipscomb
Defendant: Anthony Wills, Officer Baker and Lance Korando
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. Casasantos et al
as 1:2024cv02103
Plaintiff: Mitchell B Davis
Defendant: Detective Daniel Casasantos, Kim Fox, Darryl Hardy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hancock v. Unknown
as 3:2024cv01210
Plaintiff: Jimmy Hancock
Defendant: Unknown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?