Cases 1 - 10 of 939
Hooker v. Capri Gardens
as 2:2024cv02306
Plaintiff:
Ray Hooker
Defendant:
Capri Gardens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Floyd, Jr. v. Ford Motor Company
as 1:2024cv00428
Plaintiff:
Jiles K. Floyd, Jr.
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Currie et al v. My Fav Electronics, Inc.
as 2:2024cv00611
Plaintiff:
Paula B. Currie and Megan Finnegan-Ratliff
Defendant:
My Fav Electronics, Inc. doing business as Second Life Mac
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Non-Motor Vehicle
Banks v. Geodis Logistics, LLC et al
as 2:2024cv01595
Plaintiff:
Michael Banks
Defendant:
Geodis Logistics, LLC, Anthony Sweeney, Ryan Hart and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Wurm v. Heidelberg University
as 3:2024cv00573
Plaintiff:
Thomas Wurm
Defendant:
Heidelberg University
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Mitchell v. Kraft Heinz Foods Company, LLC
as 3:2024cv00553
Plaintiff:
Brandon Mitchell
Defendant:
Kraft Heinz Foods Company, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition For Removal--Other Contract
Sigurani v. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
as 1:2024cv00144
Plaintiff:
Verti Sigurani
Defendant:
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Sigurani v. US Environmental Protection Agency
as 2:2024cv01204
Plaintiff:
Verti Sigurani
Defendant:
US Environmental Protection Agency
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003 Job Discrimination
Martin v. Lotic.ai, Inc.
as 2:2024cv01190
Plaintiff:
Tiffany Martin
Defendant:
Lotic.ai, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Fortin v. Optalis Management Solutions, Inc.
as 2:2024cv00290
Plaintiff:
Amanda Fortin
Defendant:
Optalis Management Solutions, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
