Cases 31 - 40 of 3,143
Keeran v. Halifax Health Care Systems, Inc.
as 6:2024cv00461
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Keeran
Defendant:
Halifax Health Care Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act
IBRAHIM v. FITNESS INTERNATIONAL, LLC d/b/a LA FITNESS
as 6:2024cv00702
Plaintiff:
AHMED IBRAHIM
Defendant:
FITNESS INTERNATIONAL, LLC d/b/a LA FITNESS
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act
Naja v. UMA Education, Inc.
as 8:2024cv00479
Plaintiff:
Kathryn Naja
Defendant:
UMA Education, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act
JOHNSON v. FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT COMPANY
as 3:2024cv00158
Plaintiff:
DEJUAN JOHNSON
Defendant:
FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family and Medical Leave Act
Robles v. Firstkey Homes, LLC
as 6:2024cv00437
Plaintiff:
Krystal Robles
Defendant:
Firstkey Homes, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act
Leib v. ASG Solutions, LLC
as 5:2024cv00174
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Leib
Defendant:
ASG Solutions LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act
Osborne v. Pilgrims Pride Corporation
as 3:2024cv00347
Plaintiff:
Joshua Osborne
Defendant:
Pilgrims Pride Corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act
Seay v. Lineage Logistics Services, LLC
as 3:2024cv00151
Plaintiff:
Shawn H. Seay
Defendant:
Lineage Logistics Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Villa v. Universal Engineering Sciences Holdings, LLC et al
as 1:2024cv21262
Plaintiff:
Reinaldo Villa
Defendant:
Universal Engineering Sciences Holdings, LLC and GFA International, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2611 Family Medical Leave Act
Kent-Stevens v. CHS Employee Group LLC d/b/a YesCare
as 8:2024cv00796
Plaintiff:
Amber Kent-Stevens
Defendant:
CHS Employee Group LLC d/b/a YesCare
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
