Cases 91 - 100 of 1,936
Magema Technology LLC v. Phillips 66
as 24-1342
Plaintiff:
MAGEMA TECHNOLOGY LLC
Defendant:
PHILLIPS 66, PHILLIPS 66 CO. and WRB REFINING LP
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc.
as 24-1405
Plaintiff:
REGENERON PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
Defendant:
MYLAN PHARMACEUTICALS INC., BIOCON BIOLOGICS INC. and AMGEN USA, INC.
EscapeX IP, LLC v. Google LLC
as 24-1201
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ESCAPEX IP, LLC
Defendant / Appellee:
GOOGLE LLC
Corcept Therapeutics, Inc v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc.
as 24-1346
Plaintiff:
CORCEPT THERAPEUTICS, INC.
Defendant:
TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC.
Helmerich & Payne International Drilling Co. v. Nabors Drilling Technologies USA, Inc.
as 24-1282
Plaintiff:
HELMERICH & PAYNE INTERNATIONAL DRILLING CO., HELMERICH & PAYNE TECHNOLOGIES, LLC and MOTIVE DRILLING TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
Defendant:
NABORS DRILLING TECHNOLOGIES USA, INC.
Rothschild Connected Devices Innovations, LLC v. Coca-Cola Company
as 24-1253
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROTHSCHILD CONNECTED DEVICES INNOVATIONS, LLC
Defendant / Appellee:
COCA-COLA COMPANY
Trustees of Columbia University v. Gen Digital Inc.
as 24-1243
Plaintiff / Appellee:
THE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK
Defendant / Appellant:
GEN DIGITAL INC., fka Symantec Corporation, fka NortonLifeLock, Inc.
Appellant:
QUINN EMANUEL LLP
Barrette Outdoor Living, Inc. v. Fortress Iron, LP
as 24-1359
Plaintiff:
BARRETTE OUTDOOR LIVING, INC.
Defendant:
FORTRESS IRON, LP and FORTRESS FENCE PRODUCTS, LLC
Epistar Corporation v. Lowe's Companies, Inc.
as 24-1266
Plaintiff:
EPISTAR CORPORATION
Defendant:
LOWE'S COMPANIES, INC. and LOWE'S HOME CENTERS, LLC
Group One Ltd. v. GTE GmbH
as 24-1273
Plaintiff:
GROUP ONE LTD.
Defendant:
GTE GMBH and RALF WEIGEL, in his corporate capacity as Owner of GTE and in his individual capacity
Respondent:
UNITED STATES TENNIS ASSOCIATION, INCORPORATED
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
