Banks and Banking Cases filed in Pennsylvania
Cases 91 - 100 of 247
KING v. TD. BANK, N.A.
as 2:2013cv01870
Plaintiff: TONY DPHAX KING
Defendant: TD. BANK, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
MCCLAIN v. RBS CITIZEN'S BANK, N.A. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2013cv01547
Plaintiff: LISA MCCLAIN
Defendant: RBS CITIZEN'S BANK, N.A. and CITIZEN'S BANK OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 3410
DICIOCCIO v. WOODY'S BAR et al
as 2:2013cv01523
Plaintiff: DANIEL DICIOCCIO
Defendant: WOODY'S BAR and DOES 1-5
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1693
CODY v. TRAVEL SHOP et al
as 2:2013cv01445
Plaintiff: JONATHAN CODY
Defendant: TRAVEL SHOP and DOES 1-5
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1693 Electronic Funds Transfer Act
LOUIS v. ASIAN BANK
as 2:2013cv01447
Plaintiff: CHERYL LOUIS
Defendant: ASIAN BANK
Cause Of Action: Violation of Prov. of Subchpt.VI (Electronic Fund Transfers)
CODY v. CHESTNUT FRESHGROCER et al
as 2:2013cv01446
Plaintiff: JONATHAN CODY
Defendant: CHESTNUT FRESHGROCER and DOES 1-5
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1693 Electronic Funds Transfer Act
MCDEVITT v. UNBS INC. et al
as 2:2013cv01424
Plaintiff: JOHN MCDEVITT
Defendant: UNBS INC., SAL'S OMEGA PIZZA INC. and DOES 1-5
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1693 Electronic Funds Transfer Act
MCDEVITT v. SHARON SAVINGS BANK
as 2:2013cv01423
Plaintiff: JOHN MCDEVITT
Defendant: SHARON SAVINGS BANK
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1693 Electronic Funds Transfer Act
MCDEVITT v. GOVINDA VEGETARIAN et al
as 2:2013cv01422
Plaintiff: JOHN MCDEVITT
Defendant: GOVINDA VEGETARIAN and DOES 1-5
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1693 Electronic Funds Transfer Act
RIZZO et al v. CITIZENS BANK OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2013cv01366
Plaintiff: R.A. RIZZO and K.L. RIZZO
Defendant: CITIZENS BANK OF PENNSYLVANIA and CITIZENS FINANCIAL GROUP INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?