Cases 91 - 100 of 88,534
Bennett v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02233
Plaintiff:
Lisa Bennett
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Hodgson v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02234
Plaintiff:
Jesse Hodgson
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
McKeon v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02251
Plaintiff:
Susan McKeon
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Geringer v. Davol, Inc./C.R. Bard, Inc. Polypropylene Hernia Mesh Products Liability Litigation
as 2:2024cv02255
Plaintiff:
Gary W. Geringer
Defendant:
Davol, Inc./C.R. Bard, Inc. Polypropylene Hernia Mesh Products Liability Litigation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Cannon v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02262
Plaintiff:
James Cannon
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Martin v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02267
Plaintiff:
Sahia Martin
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Drake v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02269
Plaintiff:
Kathryn Drake
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Martin v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02271
Plaintiff:
Guy M Martin
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Atkins v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02246
Plaintiff:
Ronnie Atkins
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
James v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02237
Plaintiff:
Allen James
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
