Cases 91 - 100 of 3,314
Michael Stansell v. Keith Foley
as 23-3908
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL STANSELL
Defendant / Appellee:
WARDEN KEITH J. FOLEY
Alfred Johnson, Sr. v. Annette Chambers-Smith, et al
as 23-3891
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ALFRED A. JOHNSON, SR.
Defendant / Appellee:
ANNETTE CHAMBERS-SMITH, Director, DEVIN HOOVER, Inspector, UNIT MANAGER WILLIS and others
Mark Stinson, Sr. v. Betty Williams, et al
as 23-5918
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARK T. STINSON, SR.
Defendant / Appellee:
BETTY WILLIAMS and NATHAN BURTON
Donald Curtis v. J. Castle, et al
as 23-3944
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DONALD E. CURTIS
Defendant / Appellee:
CORRECTIONS OFFICER J. CASTLE and CORRECTIONS OFFICER J. LITTLE
Lewis Shuler, Jr. v. Adam Weeks, et al
as 23-5946
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LEWIS SHULER, JR.
Defendant / Appellee:
ADAM C. WEEKS, PAUL HARRIS, JACK STANLEY and others
Jonathon Brown v. Macon County Sheriff's Department, et al
as 23-6047
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN BROWN and JONATHON BROWN
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROY GARDNER
Defendant / Appellee:
MACON COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, dba Macon County Jail, SHERIFF MARK GAMMONS, SCOTTY SUTTON, Jail Administrator and others
Bobby Boseman v. Victoria Lambarta, et al
as 23-1999
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BOBBY BOSEMAN
Defendant / Appellee:
VICTORIA LAMBARTA, VINCENT VILLARREAL and ALBERT ESSIX
Mark Stinson, Sr. v. J. Dorsey, et al
as 23-5930
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARK T. STINSON, SR.
Defendant / Appellee:
J. DORSEY, BOP Officer and UNKNOWN SUPERIOR OFFICERS
Mark Stinson, Sr. v. John Fowlkes, Jr., et al
as 23-5869
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARK T. STINSON, SR.
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHN THOMAS FOWLKES, JR., DAMON KEITH GRIFFIN, SR., NATHAN PATRICK BROOKS and others
Andrey Bridges v. Patricia Blackmon, et al
as 23-3911
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANDREY L. BRIDGES
Defendant / Appellee:
PATRICIA BLACKMON, MARY O. BOYLE, FRANK D. CELEBREZZE, JR. and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
