Cases 91 - 100 of 2,340
Cabanez v. Assist on Call, Inc.
as 3:2020cv09470
Plaintiff:
Roy Cabanez
Defendant:
Assist on Call, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Razzhigaev et al v. eTouch Systems Corp. et al
as 4:2022cv07650
Plaintiff:
Kirill Razzhigaev and Igor Shmakov
Defendant:
eTouch Systems Corp. and Virtusa Corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv03960
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Intervenor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Phoen v. LiveRamp Holdings, Inc.
as 3:2022cv05386
Plaintiff:
Karen Phoen
Defendant:
LiveRamp Holdings, Inc. and LiveRamp Holdings, Inc. a Delaware corporation doing business as LiveRamp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
De Jesus Aldana v. Ubaldino Tree Service, LLC. et al
as 4:2022cv06343
Plaintiff:
Manuel De Jesus Aldana
Defendant:
Ubaldino Tree Service, LLC. and Ignacio Ubaldino de Leon
Blandon Adams v. AP Construction, LLC et al
as 4:2022cv06775
Plaintiff:
Melkis Cedeck Blandon Adams
Defendant:
AP Construction, LLC, Antonio Vazquez Perez and Shelly Polfus
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704 Labor Litigation
Rainford v. Freedom Financial Network LLC
as 3:2022cv05260
Plaintiff:
Nickeisha Rainford
Defendant:
Freedom Financial Network LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Botto v.The Regents of the University of California,
as 3:2022cv05408
Plaintiff:
Dr. Nina Botto
Defendant:
University of Califo Regents of the
Golden v. FPI Management, Inc.
as 3:2021cv09716
Plaintiff:
Tamiera Golden
Defendant:
FPI Management, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Labor/Mgmnt. Relations
Ahmed v. Wormuth et al
as 3:2022cv04365
Plaintiff:
Ehab Ahmed
Defendant:
Christine Wormuth and Department of the Army
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
