Cases 91 - 100 of 24,222
UNITED STATES et al v. PPG INDUSTRIES, INC.
as 2:2024cv04771
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION, COMMISSIONER, NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION and others
Defendant:
PPG INDUSTRIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 9607 Real Property Tort to Land
POWELL v. THE BOROUGH OF BERGENFIELD et al
as 2:2023cv21399
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00856
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
NJ BUILDING LABORERS STATEWIDE BENEFIT FUNDS AND THE TRUSTEES THEREOF v. KNIGHT CONSTRUCTION GROUP
as 3:2024cv04790
Petitioner:
NJ BUILDING LABORERS STATEWIDE BENEFIT FUNDS AND THE TRUSTEES THEREOF
Respondent:
KNIGHT CONSTRUCTION GROUP
Cause Of Action: 9 U.S.C. § 9 Motion to Confirm Arbitration Loan
EASTERN ATLANTIC STATES CARPENTERS BENEFIT FUNDS as successors to KEYSTONE MOUNTAIN LAKES REGIONAL COUNCIL OF CARPENTERS and the TRUSTEES THEREOF v. REGENCY DRYWALL
as 3:2024cv04796
Petitioner:
EASTERN ATLANTIC STATES CARPENTERS BENEFIT FUNDS as successors to KEYSTONE MOUNTAIN LAKES REGIONAL COUNCIL OF CARPENTERS and the TRUSTEES THEREOF
Respondent:
REGENCY DRYWALL
Cause Of Action: 9 U.S.C. § 9 Motion to Confirm Arbitration Loan
MELKOWSKI v. APPLE INC.
as 2:2024cv04827
Plaintiff:
KEVIN MELKOWSKI
Defendant:
APPLE INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
SYDNEY LIM VS Amity Debt Relief
as 1:2024cv04778
Plaintiff:
SYDNEY LIM
Defendant:
Amity Debt Relief
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
NJ BUILDING LABORERS STATEWIDE BENEFIT FUNDS AND THE TRUSTEES THEREOF v. PREMIER CONSTRUCTION USA LLC
as 2:2024cv04780
Petitioner:
NJ BUILDING LABORERS STATEWIDE BENEFIT FUNDS AND THE TRUSTEES THEREOF
Respondent:
PREMIER CONSTRUCTION USA LLC
Cause Of Action: 9 U.S.C. § 9 Motion to Confirm Arbitration Loan
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
