Cases 91 - 100 of 13,967
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00647
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Quinn v. Nasera et al
as 2:2024cv00635
Plaintiff:
Trellis Quinn
Defendant:
Gabriela Nasera, Locher, Jose Navarrete and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Polk v. State of Nevada et al
as 2:2024cv00634
Petitioner:
Gerald Jerome Polk
Respondent:
State of Nevada and Attorney General of the State of Nevada
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Robins v. Cooke
as 3:2024cv00155
Plaintiff:
Damian Robins
Defendant:
Tasheena Cooke
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lambeth v. Bean et al
as 2:2024cv00636
Plaintiff:
Jacob Lambeth
Defendant:
Jeremy Bean, Director of Medical, Director of Nursing and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mitchell v. Fraker et al
as 3:2024cv00153
Plaintiff:
Deangelo Lamont Mitchell
Defendant:
Katie Fraker and Nathanjah Breitenbach
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gilmore v. Deputy Chief Hass et al
as 2:2024cv00247
Petitioner:
Corves K. Gilmore
Defendant:
The Attorney General of the State of Nevada
Respondent:
Deputy Chief Hass
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
In Re: Dakota Romero
as 3:2024cv00151
Not Yet Classified:
Dakota Romero
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Paduani v. Johnson et al
as 3:2024cv00148
Plaintiff:
Neftali Paduani
Defendant:
Calvin Johnson, Dean Ontiveras and Hatfield
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robins v. Fairman et al
as 3:2024cv00086
Petitioner:
Damien Robins
Respondent:
Gary Fairman, Steve L. Dobrescy, Michael Bondgard and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
