Cases 91 - 100 of 4,984
NOCO Company v. Chailens Supply LLC et al.
as 1:2024cv00052
Plaintiff:
Noco Company
Defendant:
Chailens Supply LLC and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Growella Inc. v. Ganz et al
as 1:2023cv00832
Plaintiff:
Growella Inc. d/b/a Homebuyer.com and Growella Inc. doing business as Homebuyer.com
Defendant:
Phillip Ganz, Make Florida Your Home LLC, Next Wave Mortgage, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Minden Pictures, Inc. v. North Coast Scuba Inc.
as 1:2024cv00289
Defendant:
NORTH COAST SCUBA INC and North Coast Scuba Inc. doing business as Just Add Water Scuba
Plaintiff:
Minden Pictures, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Noco Company v. Tittlers Ecom LLC et al.
as 1:2024cv00063
Plaintiff:
Noco Company
Defendant:
Tittlers ECOM LLC, Tartazo Surplus LLC and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Evans v. Summit Hill Foods Inc
as 2:2023cv04149
Plaintiff:
Charles R Evans
Defendant:
Summit Hill Foods Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
as 1:2024cv00036
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
as 1:2024cv00037
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
as 1:2024cv00038
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
as 3:2024cv00020
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
as 3:2024cv00021
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
