Cases 101 - 110 of 4,980
Smith v. Coulter Ventures, LLC
as 2:2024cv00499
Plaintiff:
Brent Smith
Defendant:
Coulter Ventures, LLC doing business as Rogue Fitness
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
as 2:2024cv00348
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
as 3:2024cv00023
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings LLC v. Doe
as 5:2024cv00166
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings LLC v. Doe
as 1:2024cv00168
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Golden Rule Fasteners, Inc. v. The Neverleak Company, LP
as 1:2024pl35002
Counter Defendant:
Golden Rule Fasteners, Inc.
Defendant:
Neverleak Company, LP
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Infringement
International Watchman, Inc. v. Reeds Wilmington Jewelers, Inc. et al.
as 1:2023cv02396
Plaintiff:
International Watchman, Inc.
Defendant:
Reeds Wilmington Jewelers, Inc., Big Idea Design, LLC, M. LaHart & Company, Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Strike 3 Holdings LLC v. Doe
as 5:2024cv00165
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings LLC v. Doe
as 1:2024cv00167
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings LLC and Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
john doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Golden Rule Fasteners, Inc. v. R.P. Lumber Co., Inc.
as 1:2024pl35001
Plaintiff:
Golden Rule Fasteners, Inc.
Defendant:
R.P. Lumber Co., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 183 Patent Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
