Cases 101 - 110 of 639
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. PATRAS et al
as 3:2018cv04555
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
ANTHONY PATRAS, RUTH PATRAS and JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7403
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. BONITZ et al
as 3:2018cv04103
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
ARTHUR BONITZ, WENDY BONITZ, GLEN ARDEN HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION and others
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7401
THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. CARGULIA et al
as 3:2018cv03171
Plaintiff:
THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
JANET CARGULIA, ANDREW CARGULIA and COLUMBIA BANK
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7401
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. TAYLOR et al
as 2:2018cv02622
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
ABRAHAM TAYLOR and CHENTAY CONSULTING SERVICES, LLC
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7402
United States of America
as 2:2018cv02520
Petitioner:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7402
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. GRZENDA
as 2:2018cv02523
Petitioner:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Respondent:
PAUL W. GRZENDA
Cause Of Action: Petition to Enforce IRS Summons
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. JOHN DOE
as 2:2018cv02525
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7401
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. DONALD S. MACLACHLAN et al
as 2:2018cv01579
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
DONALD S. MACLACHLAN, MACLACHLAN LAW OFFICES, LLC, MARIE NAPOLIELLO MACLACHLAN and others
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7401
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. BURGESS et al
as 2:2018cv01571
Defendant:
JAMILAH BURGESS and J TAX SERVICE LLC
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7402
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. CAJUSTE et al
as 2:2018cv01573
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
BERTHA BABEY CAJUSTE, EMPIRES VIP FINANCIAL, INC. and EMPIRES VIP FIRM, INC.
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7402
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
