Cases 111 - 120 of 165,604
Sylvester, Jr. v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01948
Plaintiff:
John B. Sylvester, Jr.
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Clayton v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01940
Plaintiff:
Maria Kimberly Clayton
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Steele v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01942
Plaintiff:
Terry Steele
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Crea v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01944
Plaintiff:
James Crea
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Scott v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01949
Plaintiff:
Tennesa Scott
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Calloway v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01953
Plaintiff:
Kissi Calloway
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Gibson v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01955
Plaintiff:
Anna Gibson
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Scarbrough et al v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01956
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Scarbrough and Brittany Scarbrough
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Quevedo v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01957
Plaintiff:
Beverly Quevedo
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Walker v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01937
Plaintiff:
Alinda Walker
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
