Cases 111 - 120 of 191
Phillips v. KIRO-TV, Inc.
as 2:2011cv00379
Plaintiff:
Christopher B Phillips
Defendant:
KIRO-TV, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rahmani v. Stonebridge Companies et al
as 2:2011cv00201
Plaintiff:
Vadieh Rahmani
Defendant:
Stonebridge Companies , Carina Jones , Jessica Bravo and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hill & Son Excavating, Inc. et al v. East Oregonian Publishing Company
as 3:2011cv05099
Plaintiff:
Hill & Son Excavating, Inc. , Parker Hill and George Hill
Defendant:
East Oregonian Publishing Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 3:2011cv05098
Plaintiff:
George Hill , Parker Hill and Hill & Son Excavating, Inc.
Defendant:
East Oregonian Publishing Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Etherage et al v. West et al
as 3:2011cv05091
Plaintiff:
Joseph Etherage and Kirstin Etherage
Defendant:
Johnny L West and Jane Doe West
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
New York Studio, Inc. et al v. Better Business Bureau of Alaska, Oregon and Western Washington
as 3:2011cv05012
Plaintiff:
New York Studio, Inc. , Atlas Intellectual Properties, LLC and Rise of the Phoenix, Inc.
Defendant:
Better Business Bureau of Alaska, Oregon and Western Washington
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Phillips v. Mayes
as 2:2010cv02067
Plaintiff:
Christopher B Phillips
Defendant:
Larry Mayes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Isitt v. Living Stream Ministry (LSM) et al
as 2:2010cv01848
Plaintiff:
Stephen L Isitt
Defendant:
Living Stream Ministry (LSM), Sherman Robertson, Ron Kangas and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Feyissa
as 2:2010cv01721
Plaintiff:
Shakespear N Feyissa
Defendant:
Adanch Weldgebriel, Tadesse Weldgebriel, Biruk Sisay and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Robinson v. State of Washington Department of Corrections
as 3:2010cv05652
Plaintiff:
Barbara Stuart Robinson
Defendant:
State of Washington Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
