Cases 131 - 140 of 332
OVERHEAD DOOR CORPORATION v. BURGER
as 1:2012cv00101
Plaintiff:
OVERHEAD DOOR CORPORATION
Defendant:
WILLIAM H BURGER
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051 Trademark Infringement
ASSOCIATION OF AUTOMOTIVE AFTERMARKET DISTRIBUTORS INC v. AAA PARTS PLUS
as 4:2012cv00128
Plaintiff:
ASSOCIATION OF AUTOMOTIVE AFTERMARKET DISTRIBUTORS INC
Defendant:
AAA PARTS PLUS
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1121
MARENEM INC v. JUMP
as 5:2012cv00212
Plaintiff:
MARENEM INC
Defendant:
DEANNA C JUMP
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
Merial Limited et al v. VELCERA INC et al
as 3:2012cv00075
Plaintiff:
Merial Limited and Merial SAS
Defendant:
VELCERA INC and FIDOPHARM INC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145
Icon Health & Fitness Inc. v. TITSHAW
as 3:2012cv00056
Plaintiff:
Icon Health & Fitness Inc.
Defendant:
MEG TITSHAW
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
COACH INC et al v. MACON FLEA MARKET INC et al
as 5:2012cv00106
Plaintiff:
COACH INC and COACH SERVICES INC
Defendant:
MACON FLEA MARKET INC, YOUNG LAI YOO, CHONG BAE YOO and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 44
BOOST WORLDWIDE INC v. Smith
as 4:2012cv00041
Plaintiff:
BOOST WORLDWIDE INC
Defendant:
James Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
TURNER FURNITURE HOLDING CORP, v. TURNER FURNITURE COMPANY OF TIFTON INC
as 7:2012cv00004
Plaintiff:
TURNER FURNITURE HOLDING CORPORATION
Defendant:
TURNER FURNITURE COMPANY OF TIFTON INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
DIGITAL CONCEALMENT SYSTEMS LLC v. HYPERSTEALTH BIOTECHNOLOGY CORP
as 4:2011cv00195
Defendant:
HYPERSTEALTH BIOTECHNOLOGY CORP
Plaintiff:
DIGITAL CONCEALMENT SYSTEMS LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
BROADCAST MUSIC INC et al v. BTG OF GEORGIA INC et al
as 5:2011cv00485
Plaintiff:
BROADCAST MUSIC INC , MJ PUBLISHING TRUST , BOCEPHUS MUSIC INC and others
Defendant:
BTG OF GEORGIA INC, ROBERT L BAILEY, GREGORY J WELFORD and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
