Cases 31 - 40 of 35,853
Nathan Randall Beahn v. Martin O Malley
as 8:2024cv01014
Plaintiff:
Nathan Randall Beahn
Defendant:
Commissioner of SS Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Miguel Gonzalo Jimenez v. Martin O'Malley
as 2:2024cv03857
Plaintiff:
MIGUEL GONZALO JIMENEZ
Defendant:
MARTIN O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Randall v. O'Malley
as 5:2024cv02736
Plaintiff:
Robert Lee Randall
Defendant:
Comm'r of Soc. Martin J. O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA (INTERESTED PARTY / NEF)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Sharon Perry v. Martin O'Malley
as 2:2024cv03781
Plaintiff:
Sharron Perry
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
(SS) Giron v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00541
Plaintiff:
Jo Giron
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
Bond v. O'Malley
as 3:2024cv00799
Plaintiff:
Dwight Maurice Bond
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0402 Social Security Benefits
(SS) Meas v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2024cv01295
Plaintiff:
Stacey Savy Meas
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Brooks v. O'Malley, Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv02687
Plaintiff:
Noah N Brooks
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley, Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Alessi v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv02689
Plaintiff:
Frances Alessi
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA (INTERESTED PARTY / NEF)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
v. Giron et al
as 1:2024at00367
Defendant:
Jo Giron and Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
