Other Fraud Cases filed in Oregon
Cases 31 - 40 of 302
Lawley v. Humm Kombucha LLC
as 6:2023cv00170
Plaintiff: TABATHA LAWLEY
Defendant: Humm Kombucha and Humm Kombucha LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Easterbrook v. LinkedIn Corporation We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 6:2022cv01108
Plaintiff: Julie Easterbrook
Defendant: LinkedIn Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Gerwald v. USA We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 6:2023cv00382
Plaintiff: Anaissa B. Gerwald and Ann E. Meraw
Defendant: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Walter v. Pfizer, Inc.
as 3:2022cv01708
Plaintiff: Daphne Walter
Defendant: Pfizer, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Barton v. Dawson Law Group, PC et al
as 3:2022cv01775
Plaintiff: Malinda Barton
Defendant: Dawson Law Group, Bryan Dawson and Dawson Law Group, PC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity - Legal Malpractice
Poticny v. Movers and Packers Relocation Specialists LLC We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2022cv01243
Plaintiff: Michael Poticny
Defendant: Movers and Packers Relocation Specialists LLC
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 14706 Interstate Transportation - Carmack Amendment
Nettleton v. Exact Sciences Corporation We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 6:2022cv01290
Plaintiff: Christopher Nettleton
Defendant: Exact Sciences Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Rouffy v. Walgreen Co.
as 3:2022cv01127
Plaintiff: Elizabeth Rouffy
Defendant: Walgreen Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Rothe v. Anchor QEA, LLC We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2022cv00992
Plaintiff: Tyler Rothe
Defendant: Anchor QEA, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Weathers v. Doe
as 6:2022cv01090
Plaintiff: Douglas Weathers
Defendant: John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?