Cases 31 - 40 of 2,347
Romero v. Harpe et al
as 5:2024cv00325
Plaintiff:
Albert Andrew Romero
Defendant:
Steven Harpe, Susan Campbell and Robert Nogel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Turley
as 5:2024cv00132
Plaintiff:
Dermond C Jones, Jr.
Defendant:
Terri Turley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gravlee v. Oklahoma State of et al
as 5:2024cv00167
Plaintiff:
John Christian Gravlee and John Kennedy
Defendant:
Oklahoma State of, Garfield County Authority, Oklahoma Bar Association and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kosier v. Garvin County Jail Staff et al
as 5:2024cv00145
Plaintiff:
Austin Kosier
Defendant:
Garvin County Jail Staff and Garvin County Sheriffs Staff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Coker v. Stitt et al
as 5:2024cv00147
Plaintiff:
David Wayne Coker
Defendant:
Kevin Stitt, Kameron Harvanek, Matthew Sinnett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brooks v. Lilly et al
as 5:2024cv00122
Plaintiff:
Clarence Brooks
Defendant:
Amanda Lilly and Oklahoma State of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Kellogg v. Aguilera et al
as 5:2024cv00135
Plaintiff:
Timothy James Kellogg
Defendant:
Tony Aguilera, Jace Gilley, Cole Jack and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Kliewer v. Garfield County Detention Center et al
as 5:2024cv00124
Plaintiff:
Matthew Kliewer
Defendant:
Garfield County Detention Center, Corey Rink and Daylyn Rivers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sparks v. Gulickson et al
as 5:2024cv00136
Plaintiff:
Timothy William Sparks and Timothy William Schwanz
Defendant:
FNU Gulickson, FNU Bouche, FNU Goldey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Campbell v. Morgan et al
as 5:2024cv00158
Plaintiff:
Michael A Campbell
Defendant:
Patrick Morgan and Unknown Named Agents
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
