Cases 41 - 50 of 3,941
Ford v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv02881
Plaintiff:
Adam Ford
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Stump v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv02883
Plaintiff:
Timothy Stump
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Harvey III v. Franklin, et al.
as 4:2023cv01518
Plaintiff:
Robert Harvey III
Defendant:
Mayor William Franklin, Christopher A. Taneyhill Sr., Eddie L. Colbert and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Thiel v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv02825
Defendant:
Scott J. Thiel, C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Goodell v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv02818
Plaintiff:
Robert Goodell
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
King v. C.R. BARD,INC. et al
as 2:2023cv02820
Plaintiff:
Dan King
Defendant:
C.R. BARD,INC. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Citizens Bank NA v. Dib Dudar
as 3:2023cv01819
Plaintiff:
Citizens Bank NA
Defendant:
Abdur-Rahim Dib Dudar
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Village of New Richmond v. 3M Company et al
as 1:2023cv00508
Defendant:
3M Company, Raytheon Technologies Corporation, AGC, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Village of New Richmond
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Board of County Commissioners of Warren County, Ohio v. 3M Company et al
as 1:2023cv00512
Plaintiff:
Board of County Commissioners of Warren County, Ohio
Defendant:
3M Company, E.I. Dupont De NeMours and Company, The Chemours Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Larue v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv02755
Plaintiff:
Nakesha Larue
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
