Cases 41 - 50 of 17,802
Rosalyn Unique McGee v. Martin J. O Malley
as 5:2024cv00803
Plaintiff:
Rosalyn Unique McGee
Defendant:
Martin J. O Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Agatha Marie Frank v. Martin O'Malley
as 5:2024cv00815
Plaintiff:
Agatha Marie Frank
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Shamika Nicole Thirsty v. Martin O'Malley
as 5:2024cv00816
Plaintiff:
SHAMIKA NICOLE THIRSTY
Defendant:
MARTIN O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Timothy Riha v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2024cv00763
Plaintiff:
Timothy Riha
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Richard Godoy Magana v. Martin O'Malley
as 5:2024cv00798
Plaintiff:
Richard Godoy Magana
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Jack Robert Smith v. Martin OMalley
as 2:2024cv01689
Plaintiff:
Jack Robert Smith
Defendant:
Martin OMalley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Sandra Ibette Dorado Barrientos v. Martin O Malley
as 2:2024cv01423
Plaintiff:
Sandra Ibette Dorado Barrientos
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley and Martin O Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Juan Carlos Vizaga v. Martin J. O Malley
as 5:2024cv00786
Plaintiff:
Juan Carlos Vizaga
Defendant:
Martin J. O Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Lawrence Harrell v. Martin O'Malley
as 5:2024cv00392
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Harrell
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
Jennifer Lynn Retich v. Martin O'Malley
as 2:2024cv02984
Plaintiff:
JENNIFER LYNN RETICH
Defendant:
Commissioner Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
