Cases 41 - 50 of 4,631
McKennedy v. The State of Michigan
as 2:2024cv00424
Plaintiff:
Calvin McKennedy
Defendant:
The State of Michigan
Rager v. McMahill
as 2:2024cv00248
Petitioner:
Gregory James Rager
Respondent:
Kevin McMahill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Allen v. Oliver
as 2:2024cv00475
Plaintiff:
Derrick B. Allen
Defendant:
Ronald Oliver
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Turner v. Bean et al
as 2:2024cv00495
Petitioner:
John Turner
Respondent:
Jeremy Bean and The Attorney General of the State of Nevada
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hemingway v. Beau et al
as 2:2024cv00156
Petitioner:
Payton Hemingway and Peyton Hemingway
Respondent:
Jeremy Beau and Nevada Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mason v. State of Nevada et al
as 3:2024cv00116
Petitioner:
Mack Mason
Respondent:
State of Nevada and The Attorney General of the State of Nevada
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rodriguez v. State of Nevada et al
as 3:2024cv00032
Petitioner:
Elmer Rodriguez
Respondent:
State of Nevada, Breitenbach and Nevada Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Medina v. State of Nevada et al
as 2:2024cv00258
Petitioner:
Albert Medina
Respondent:
State of Nevada, James Scally and Nevada Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Randolph v. Dzurendas
as 2:2024cv00106
Petitioner:
Louis Randolph and Clyde Lewis
Respondent:
James Dzurenda
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rios v. Williams et al
as 2:2024cv00059
Petitioner:
Thomas Rios
Respondent:
Warden Williams and The Attorney General of the State of Nevada
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
