Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in Oklahoma
Cases 41 - 50 of 10,818
Randle-Giles v. Davis et al
as 5:2024cv00362
Plaintiff: Edgar Royce Randle-Giles
Defendant: Bradley Davis and Enid Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cross v. Lovell et al
as 5:2024cv00156
Plaintiff: Douglas Roy Cross, Jr
Defendant: Bryan Lovell, Logan Niles, FNU Gibson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Harding
as 5:2024cv00355
Petitioner: Michael D Johnson
Respondent: Randy Harding
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rich v. Ceiss et al
as 5:2024cv00205
Plaintiff: JT Rich
Defendant: Cortnie Ciess, Jerry Hurburger, Cheyenne Underwood and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gibbs v. USA
as 4:2024cv00152
Petitioner: Andrew Gibbs
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Rowbotham v. Bridges
as 4:2024cv00151
Petitioner: Roger D Rowbotham
Respondent: Carrie Bridges
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Livingston v. Regalado
as 4:2024cv00153
Petitioner: Aaron J Livingston
Respondent: Vic Regalado
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Christian v. United States of America
as 5:2024cv00353
Respondent: United States of America
Petitioner: James Cornelius Christian
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Purdy v. Harpe
as 5:2024cv00348
Petitioner: Aaron C Purdy
Respondent: Steven Harpe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Viers v. Shriner et al
as 5:2024cv00198
Plaintiff: Timothy Lyn Viers
Defendant: Dr FNU Shriner and Mental Health Prescriber
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?