Cases 51 - 60 of 123
Rollock Co, et al v. USA
as 14-2028
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROLLOCK CO, A Corporation, ANTHONY KORDELL, an individual and CHRISTOPHER KORDELL, an individual
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Dan Patterson v. Government of the Virgin Islan, et al
as 14-1621
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAN E. PATTERSON
Defendant - Appellee:
GOVERNMENT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS and VI BUREAU OF INTERNAL REVENUE
USA v. Ronald Gregg, et al
as 14-1422
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
RONALD C. GREGG and DEBORAH L. GREGG
Defendant - Appellee:
ESATATE OF IRVING G. KLUGH, Marilyn J. Klugh, Executrix
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE
USA v. David Lesonik, et al
as 13-4632
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
DAVID L. LESONIK
Defendant:
SHERWIN WILLIAMS CO, GLIDDEN CO, NORTHWEST SAVINGS BANK and others
USA v. David L. Lesonik, et al
as 13-4476
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
SHERWIN WILLIAMS CO, GLIDDEN CO, NORTHWEST SAVINGS BANK and others
Defendant - Appellant:
DAVID L. LESONIK
Huafeng Xu v. Farkhanda Naqvi, et al
as 13-3168
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HUAFENG XU
Defendant - Appellee:
FARKHANDA NAQVI, MICHELLE BUSKETT and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
USA v. Gregory Bishop, et al
as 13-3100
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
GREGORY JOHN BISHOP
Defendant - Appellee:
CHASE HOME FINANCE LLC
Brian Tech v. USA
as 13-2503
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BRIAN TECH, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated.
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
USA v. Gregory Bishop, et al
as 13-2478
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
GREGORY JOHN BISHOP
Defendant - Appellee:
CHASE HOME FINANCE LLC
Renee Vento v. USA
as 13-2461
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RENEE VENTO, LLC
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
