Cases 51 - 60 of 3,698
Allahyari v. Abbas Naqvi
as 3:2024cv00406
Plaintiff:
Hassan Allahyari
Defendant:
Syed Zarq Abbas Naqvi
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 0101 Copyright Infringement (definitions)
Asgari Pargal Dental Partnership v. James Grant DDS, Inc.
as 3:2024cv00380
Plaintiff:
Asgari Pargal Dental Partnership
Defendant:
James Grant DDS, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
as 3:2024cv00162
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 0101 Copyright Infringement (definitions)
LightSource Ventures, Inc. v. Lightsource BP
as 3:2023cv02340
Defendant:
Lightsource BP and Lightsource Renewable Energy North America LLC
Plaintiff:
LightSource Ventures, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
BowFlex Inc. v. Aslan et al
as 3:2024cv00064
Plaintiff:
BowFlex Inc.
Defendant:
Umut Aslan and Selim Aslan
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 0271 Patent Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
as 3:2024cv00154
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 0101 Copyright Infringement (definitions)
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
as 3:2024cv00161
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 0101 Copyright Infringement (definitions)
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
as 3:2024cv00158
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 0101 Copyright Infringement (definitions)
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
as 3:2024cv00153
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 0101 Copyright Infringement (definitions)
TMSSS Enterprise LLC et al v. Tooma et al
as 3:2024cv00012
Plaintiff:
TMSSS Enterprise LLC and Alejandro Medina
Defendant:
James Tooma, Chaldean Properties Inc. and Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051 Trademark Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
